Abstract: As artificial intelligence systems become embedded in organizational decision-making, a critical question emerges: do employees defer to AI recommendations on ethical choices the same way they surrender to AI on cognitive tasks? This article synthesizes recent experimental evidence demonstrating that AI moral influence operates directionally rather than symmetrically. When AI systems recommend prosocial behaviors—such as generosity, cooperation, or honesty—individuals show substantial behavioral shifts. Yet when AI recommends antisocial actions, compliance fails to materialize, even when participants verbally acknowledge the recommendation. This asymmetry inverts patterns observed in human-to-human behavioral contagion, where antisocial influence typically dominates. The findings reveal a domain boundary in AI authority: algorithmic systems can activate existing moral preferences but cannot override them. For organizations deploying AI-assisted decision systems, these results carry significant implications for ethics, governance, and the design of human-AI collaboration frameworks that preserve rather than erode moral agency.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Powered by the WRKdefined Podcast Network.


